Showing posts with label editorial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label editorial. Show all posts

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Yarn, Guts, Sailors, and Stories

Gather 'round.  Let me tell you a story about...um...storytelling.  Before the proverbial chicken and/or egg there was the story and/or fire.  Was fire discovered to warm the storytellers or did storytelling start from sitting around the fire?  To be honest, for this blog post, that detail doesn't matter: that's another story (pause to laugh).

Stories not only retell our past, but they actually create it.  Honestly, what is the past until one person relates it to another person (or themself)?  Nothing, right?  Time moves forward with the perpetual present annihilating the past at every moment.  Storytelling creates it again.  Ooooh, mysterious (try saying that out loud, it sounds better).   

There's something massively entertaining about a good story, a tall tale, spinning a good yarn.  Further, there's actually a good tale about "spinning a yarn" that's nearly as ancient.

Actually, the phrase "spin a yarn", meaning to tell a story, isn't that old.  Sailors started using it in the early 1800's.  They likened telling tall tales to other laid back activities like spinning yarn.  There's something else quite telling about this comparison, though...maybe.

Yarn is long, pieces strung together, and in turn constructed into a garment.  I'm sure you can draw the similarities between narratives and yarn yourself.  The symbolism between the Jungian archtypical woman spinning yarn and telling stories, chatting, gossiping, and bragging of their families is no accident (or maybe it is...I don't know).  I can't help thinking that the yarn we spin somehow builds something much bigger.

Interestingly, yarn comes from the Old German word garn which means yarn.  Sorry, that's not the part that was interesting.  The Old German word garn comes from the Greek word chorde.  Chorde also meant string, which is also not interesting (trust me, I'm getting there).  To be more specific it meant something string-like in an animal: the intestines (yeah, string used to be made from cattle gut).  When someone says "It struck a chord with me", whether they know it or not, this is the chord they're referring to.  This "chord" refers to a literal gut reaction (not a guitar chord, like I thought).  The connections between chorde, yarn, and storytelling are dubious but I'll choose to believe there is one (to at least add intrigue and enigma to my life).

This yarn doesn't end, though.  Chorde in Greek gets translated into hernia in Latin.  When you're done laughing we can move on.  I'll wait.  Ok, hernia refers to a different kind of storytelling.  We usually tell of past adventures and exploits.  Hernia actually meant "rupture", as in when the intestines rupture out of the belly (just like it means today).

Soothsayers in ancient Rome would split an animal down the middle and tell you your future.  A story of days of future passed (Moody Blues in the house!).  These stories have been told by ancient Roman soothsayers, by the Etruscans before them, the Greeks before them, the Persians before them, and the Babylonians before them.

Were the ancient soothsayers and gut reactions swimming in the collective subconscious of early 19th century sailors when they started asking they're pals to "spin a yarn"? Meh.  I dunno.  But it's nice to think that it was. It's romantic to think that it's one thread in a multi-millenia long story; a thread that weaves in and out of some larger psychological cloth...or maybe someone should just yell "shut up hippie!".

what I listened to while typing: The Flaming Lips - Time (Pink Floyd cover)



      

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

The Evil of Cute

"You're so cute, I could just eat you!"  Thank God they never did.  What is it about cuteness, though, that inspires threats of pinching, twisting, squeezing, and biting?  In short, why does cuteness foment violence?
We can begin by agreeing that these violent impulses are not consciously thought about, rationalized, or planned out.  Rather, they are automatic and sub/unconscious, akin to laughing or blushing (albeit, much more sinister).  So where do they come from?  Let's briefly turn to them kooky psychoanalysts: Freud & and friends.
You may reply to this by saying: "Hey!  I ain't no mother-lovin' psycho because I pinch when I baby talk".  Not so fast, crazy.  Freud said that pain inflicted and received in love is sadomasochism.  To paraphrase: Freud believed that sadomasochists inflict pain on others to express love.
So why does Auntie S&M get pleasure out of expressing her love by inflicting pain on me?  Well, according to Freud, sex is naturally rough stuff.   Sadism is that sexual aggression that's gotten out of hand.  If you you're familiar with good ol' Sigmund you've probably noticed that love and violence go hand in hand for him.  Sadism is when the violent part starts flying off the handle.
Since I could go on for much longer than good taste will allow I'm going to end it here.  Am I serious about all of this baby-talk-pinchy-squeezey-s&m?  I don't remember. However, it does get me thinking.
We may not all have OCD but we all have some obsessive compulsions.  We may not be schizophrenic, but a good self-esteem requires some delusions.  We may not all be into S&M bondage, but at times we may mistake our aggression for affection.
It becomes clear that there are not two distinct groups of "crazy" and "sane".  Rather, there is a mental health continuum and we all dot it from one end to the other.  Where does the crazy start and sane end?  I hope not at the whim of social caprice...but I am pessimistic.  

What I listened to while typing: Flying Lotus - Nose Art